Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753479Ab0K1P5b (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:57:31 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.34]:4069 "EHLO smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753300Ab0K1P50 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:57:26 -0500 From: Hans Verkuil To: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v6 03/12] media: Entities, pads and links Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:57:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-rc2-tschai; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mark Brown , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com, lennart@poettering.net References: <1290652099-15102-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <20101126141442.GI30360@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <201011281334.46386.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <201011281334.46386.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011281657.00408.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1709 Lines: 42 On Sunday, November 28, 2010 13:34:45 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Friday 26 November 2010 15:14:42 Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > It's supposed to reflect whether the link can carry data. Think of > > > > > the active flag as a valve on a pipe. If the valve is open, the link > > > > > is active. If the valve is closed, the link is inactive. This is > > > > > unrelated to whether water actually flows through the pipe. > > > > > > > > This seems a confusing name, then - I'd expect an active link to be one > > > > which is actually carrying data rather than one which is available to > > > > carry data. How a more neutrally worded name such as "connected" > > > > (which is what ASoC uses currently)? > > > > > > In our current vocabulary "connected" refers to entities between which a > > > link exist, regardless of the link state ("valve opened" or "valve > > > closed"). I'm not totally happy with "active" either, but if we replace > > > it with "connected" we need another word to replace current uses of > > > "connected". > > > > Linked? > > That's a good option. Hans, do you want to comment on this ? > > Fine by me! It's better than 'active'. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/