Subject: Re: Scheduler grouping failure; division by zero in
 select_task_rq_fair
From: Frede Feuerstein <Frede_Feuerstein@gmx.net>
Reply-To: Frede_Feuerstein@gmx.net
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        603229@bugs.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1291031425.32004.16.camel@laptop>
References: <1290449310.3868.13.camel@localhost>
	 <1290470134.6770.929.camel@localhost>  <1290514638.3892.16.camel@localhost>
	 <1290900814.3292.84.camel@localhost> <1290920436.4255.1025.camel@localhost>
	 <1290975266.3292.316.camel@localhost>  <1291031425.32004.16.camel@laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ger=F6llhalde?=
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:58:13 +0100
Message-ID: <1291039093.26937.9.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 987
Lines: 27

On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:50 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:14 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> > [    0.856002] Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 W1100z/2100z
> 
> What's in that kernel? is that simply the latest .32-stable?

It was the latest stable .32 contained in the official "squeeze".
Today a new one arrived. I shall try that tomorrow on today late night,
since i cannot reset the mill right now.

Additional remark:
When i said, that the cores contained in each chip do not share any
resources, i forgot about the clock source:
The clock is set globally for each whole chip, i.e. CPU0 and CPU1 are
always running on the same clock, as well as CPU2 and CPU3 do.

Best regards

Tilo Hacke


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/