Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:06:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Frede_Feuerstein@gmx.net,
        603229@bugs.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler grouping failure; division by zero in
 select_task_rq_fair
Message-ID: <20101129180605.GC14046@elte.hu>
References: <1290449310.3868.13.camel@localhost>
 <1290470134.6770.929.camel@localhost>
 <1290514638.3892.16.camel@localhost>
 <1290900814.3292.84.camel@localhost>
 <1290920436.4255.1025.camel@localhost>
 <1290975266.3292.316.camel@localhost>
 <1291031425.32004.16.camel@laptop>
 <20101129162605.GH8695@decadent.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101129162605.GH8695@decadent.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3260
Lines: 74


* Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:14 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 
> > > [    0.856002] Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 W1100z/2100z
> > 
> > What's in that kernel? is that simply the latest .32-stable?
> 
> No, we have quite a few backported driver features and some bug fixes
> that aren't in stable yet.  No scheduler or topology changes except
> reverting 669c55e9f99b90e46eaa0f98a67ec53d46dc969a for ABI reasons
> (which I guess we don't actually need to do).
> 
> > > [    0.536554] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> > > [    0.540004]  domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> > > [    0.548002]   groups: 0 1
> > > [    0.560003]   domain 1: span 0-3 level NODE
> > > [    0.568002]    groups:
> > > [    0.574179] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > > [    0.576002]
> > > [    0.580002] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > > [    0.584004] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> > > [    0.588007]  domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> > > [    0.596002]   groups: 1 0 (cpu_power = 1023)
> > > [    0.612002] ERROR: parent span is not a superset of domain->span
> > > [    0.616003]   domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > > [    0.624002]    groups: 1 (cpu_power = 2048) 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > > [    0.644003]    domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > > [    0.652004]     groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > > [    0.668002] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > > [    0.672002]
> > > [    0.676002] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > > [    0.680004] CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> > > [    0.684003]  domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> > > [    0.692003]   groups: 2 3
> > > [    0.704003]   domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > > [    0.712003]    groups: 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048) 1 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > > [    0.736003]    domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > > [    0.744003]     groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > > [    0.760003] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > > [    0.764003]
> > > [    0.768003] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > > [    0.772004] CPU3 attaching sched-domain:
> > > [    0.776003]  domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> > > [    0.784003]   groups: 3 2
> > > [    0.794183]   domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > > [    0.800003]    groups: 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048) 1 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > > [    0.822183]    domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > > [    0.828003]     groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > > [    0.842180] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > > [    0.844003]
> > > [    0.848003] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > 
> > Hrm that smells like the architecture topology setup is wrecked, looks
> > like the NUMA setup is bonkers.
> [...]
> 
> Right, that's what I thought.  Question is whether the topology setup
> code should fix this up or whether the schedular init should (as it
> appears to have done before 2.6.32).

We definitely want to robustify scheduler init code to not crash and to (if 
possible) print a warning about the borkage.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/