Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:51:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:51:47 -0400 Received: from faui02.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.102]:23221 "EHLO faui02.informatik.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:51:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:20:50 +0200 From: Richard Zidlicky To: Anjali Kulkarni Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: scheduler problems Message-ID: <20020612122050.A1832@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <200206120714.AAA07894@eagle.he.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:14:09AM -0700, Anjali Kulkarni wrote: > > > (given that the current 2.2 kernel is 2.2.21, the first thing would > be to > > test it there too.) > > > > Thanks, I 'll do that. > > > > [...] It is due to the fact that the schedule() function does not > find > > > the 'current' process in the runqueue. [...] > > > > a crash in line 384 means that the runqueue got corrupted by > something, > > most likely caused by buggy kernel code outside of the scheduler. > > Right, I thought of that, but how is it that it gets corrupt at exactly > the same offset in task_struct of that process and every time with > different processes? (I have run it atleast 20-30 times). And it just > doesnt come if I kill the process in question? I've had similar problems when some code invalidated CPU cache and an interrupt came in at the wrong time. Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/