Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:59:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:59:22 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:18645 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:59:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020612.145453.95533845.davem@redhat.com> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, rml@tech9.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57:34 +0200 (CEST) here is a solution that allows us to eat and have the pudding at once. (patch attached, against Linus' latest BK tree): Thanks for doing this, it looks fine to me. Also, thanks for being so thorough in your testing. If only everyone would do this :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/