Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753853Ab0K3WUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:20:43 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:49847 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751967Ab0K3WUm (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:20:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [192.91.75.238] In-Reply-To: <20101130190058.GX17222@atomide.com> References: <1290526740-27624-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1290526740-27624-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20101130190058.GX17222@atomide.com> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:20:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , Benoit Cousson , Grant Likely , Hari Kanigeri , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 16 On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Do we even need the hwspin_lock variants, I personally don't have any specific use case in mind. It's just a simple wrapper over the _timeout variants, provided for API completeness, but - > why can't we always use the hwspin_lock_timeout variants? We can. I can just remove the _lock variants. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/