Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:23:29 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework
Message-ID: <20101130222328.GB17222@atomide.com>
References: <1290526740-27624-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
 <1290526740-27624-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com>
 <20101130190058.GX17222@atomide.com>
 <AANLkTi=73VQeBj_M_PJO5OzJJDgWOXHkw31tN4z-nqMu@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=73VQeBj_M_PJO5OzJJDgWOXHkw31tN4z-nqMu@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 722
Lines: 21

* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [101130 14:10]:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Do we even need the hwspin_lock variants,
> 
> I personally don't have any specific use case in mind.
> 
> It's just a simple wrapper over the _timeout variants, provided for
> API completeness, but -
> 
> > why can't we always use the hwspin_lock_timeout variants?
> 
> We can. I can just remove the _lock variants.

OK sounds good to me.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/