Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CF5C379.8030204@google.com>
References: <20101121133744.GA10765@elte.hu>
	 <1290700829.4759.16.camel@maggy.simson.net>
	 <1290954299.30515.15.camel@marge.simson.net>  <4CF5C379.8030204@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:16:13 +0100
Message-Id: <1291184173.7466.147.camel@marge.simson.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 961
Lines: 24

On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 19:39 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> On 11/28/10 06:24, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Something else is seriously wrong though.  36.1 with attached (plus
> > sched, cgroup: Fixup broken cgroup movement) works a treat, whereas
> > 37.git and tip with fixlet below both suck rocks.  With a make -j40
> > running, wakeup-latency is showing latencies of>100ms, amarok skips,
> > mouse lurches badly.. generally horrid.  Something went south.
> 
> I'm looking at this.
> 
> The share:share ratios looked good in static testing, but perhaps we 
> need a little more wake-up boost to improve interactivity.

Yeah, feels like a wakeup issue.  I too did a (brief) static test, and
that looked ok.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/