Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753133Ab0LALel (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:34:41 -0500 Received: from fep18.mx.upcmail.net ([62.179.121.38]:39771 "EHLO fep18.mx.upcmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308Ab0LALek (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:34:40 -0500 X-SourceIP: 80.56.199.130 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups From: Peter Zijlstra To: Paul Turner Cc: Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , Linus Torvalds , LKML In-Reply-To: <4CF5C379.8030204@google.com> References: <20101121133744.GA10765@elte.hu> <1290700829.4759.16.camel@maggy.simson.net> <1290954299.30515.15.camel@marge.simson.net> <4CF5C379.8030204@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:34:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1291203272.4023.6.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=YkiHm+ATFBqfWDprzc7VyYVud6sOBg0JMTRaeRDeqNo= c=1 sm=0 a=gKIfv9-gHswA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ubsNcGKNOhfYDG52H2gA:9 a=bBKDcWkm4dD2mDgLUuoqhj_aPFcA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1455 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 19:39 -0800, Paul Turner wrote: > On 11/28/10 06:24, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:00 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > >> My vacation is (sniff) over, so I won't get a fully tested patch out the > >> door for review until I get back home. > > > > Either I forgot to pack my eyeballs, or laptop is just too dinky and > > annoying. Now back home on beloved box, this little bugger poked me > > dead in the eye. > > > > Something else is seriously wrong though. 36.1 with attached (plus > > sched, cgroup: Fixup broken cgroup movement) works a treat, whereas > > 37.git and tip with fixlet below both suck rocks. With a make -j40 > > running, wakeup-latency is showing latencies of>100ms, amarok skips, > > mouse lurches badly.. generally horrid. Something went south. > > > > I'm looking at this. > > The share:share ratios looked good in static testing, but perhaps we > need a little more wake-up boost to improve interactivity. > > Should have something tomorrow. Right, the previous thing cheated quite enormous with wakeups simply because it was way too expensive to compute proper shares on wakeups. Maybe we should re-instate some of that cheating. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/