Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754664Ab0LAPFV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:05:21 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:46259 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754007Ab0LAPFT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:05:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=sIVKn2JbV/nUHIKEByjLfeiHj30Pcjz2NBUA6NqTBOOJR26H+ayPVyp0GmeBfTkE5B KIBoDhNbD7SEShmLNQISgD50+IPxn3N7GYx/6CJe4DBmwKs9lQxXE/P98x5RNjggQWwf xQcdrjK57JU3bNtbVj5fVkkUrudn3m13Lxq6M= Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:05:08 +0100 (CET) From: Hans Ulli Kroll X-X-Sender: elektroman@localhost.localdomain To: Arnd Bergmann cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Hans Ulli Kroll , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Miros=B3aw?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI Bus In-Reply-To: <201011301719.03202.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: References: <1290263224-16965-1-git-send-email-ulli.kroll@googlemail.com> <201011291657.53316.arnd@arndb.de> <20101130160527.GB2377@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201011301719.03202.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1362 Lines: 48 On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, the above is correct. What I was talking about was the difference > > between these: > > > > config PCI > > bool "PCI support" if MIGHT_HAVE_PCI > > > > and > > > > config PCI > > bool "PCI support" > > depends on MIGHT_HAVE_PCI > > > > In the first instance, PCI itself does not depend on MIGHT_HAVE_PCI. > > MIGHT_HAVE_PCI controls whether the user is offered the "PCI support" > > option. > > > > In the second instance, PCI depends on MIGHT_HAVE_PCI, which must be > > set to 'y' to offer the option and also if PCI is selected. > > Right, I misread the patch as doing the wrong thing, thanks for > clearing that up. > > > We want the first behaviour. Platforms which must have PCI support can > > continue to select PCI as they currently do, and leave the MIGHT_HAVE_PCI > > option alone. > > > > Platforms which may optionally have PCI support should select > > MIGHT_HAVE_PCI instead. > > Yes, that sounds good. > > Arnd > OK. I prepare some patch. Ulli -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/