Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756176Ab0LASpU (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:45:20 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50387 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753052Ab0LASpT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:45:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:45:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20101201.104546.39187178.davem@davemloft.net> To: dpstrand@gmail.com Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: check for assigned mac before adopting the slaves mac address From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <8879.1290741991@death> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 956 Lines: 27 From: David Strand Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:25:19 -0800 > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> >> ? ? ? ?Ok, fair enough. ?If we want to get back to the original >> behavior, however, your patch should only test for zero MAC address >> instead of testing for zero MAC address in addition to first slave. >> >> ? ? ? ?-J >> >> --- >> ? ? ? ?-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com >> > > Understood, that makes sense. The updated patch is below. You need to provide a fresh posting of your patch, with a full commit messag and proper Subject: line, as well as a proper "Signed-off-by: " tag. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/