Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756209Ab0LASrb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:47:31 -0500 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:47850 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756186Ab0LASra (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:47:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF69840.3040704@goop.org> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:47:28 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefano Stabellini CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Xen PV on HVM fixes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 19 On 12/01/2010 10:22 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi all, > this patch series is a collection of fixes for Xen PV on HVM. > > The first two patches fix two pirq remapping problems with MSIs, they > have been sent to the list few times already for comments. > The three following patches are new and fix save/restore bugs. Are you targeting these at 3.6.37-rc? If so, each changelog commit should explicitly say what bug is being fixed, and what the impact of the bug is. The last 3 are OK, but it isn't clear to me whether the first two are strictly bugfixes or not. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/