Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756259Ab0LAWjx (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:39:53 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:37248 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755356Ab0LAWjw (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:39:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:38:56 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Trond Myklebust , Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Nick Bowler , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir Message-Id: <20101201143856.51f4f9d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1291217804-11257-1-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291217804-11257-2-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <20101201150428.GA2879@elliptictech.com> <1291217804-11257-3-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291217804-11257-4-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291229669.6609.24.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1291234251.6609.39.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101201123341.d12ef362.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101201133831.ea6ba10a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1291240272.6609.50.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101201141351.8609140b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1971 Lines: 50 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:24:42 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:51:12 -0500 > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > Probably on most call paths we'll be OK - if a process is in the middle > >> > of a file truncate, holdin a file* ref which holds an inode ref then > >> > nobody will be unmounting that fs and hence nobody will be unloading > >> > that module. > >> > > >> > However on the random_code->alloc_page->vmscan->releasepage path, none > >> > of that applies. > >> > >> Just out of interest, what ensures that the mapping is still around for > >> the 'spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);' in __remove_mapping()? > > > > Nothing, afacit. > > No, we're good. > > Module unload has to go through a "stop_machine()" cycle, and that in > turn requires an idle period for everything. And just a preemption > reschedule isn't enough for that. > > So what is sufficient is that > > - we had the page locked and on the mapping > > This implies that we had an inode reference to the module, and the > page lock means that the inode reference cannot go away (because it > will involve invalidate-pages etc) > > - we're not sleeping after __remove_mapping, so unload can't happen afterwards. > > A _lot_ of the module races depend on that latter thing. We have > almost no cases that are strictly about actual reference counts etc. > OK, the stop_machine() plugs a lot of potential race-vs-module-unload things. But Trond is referring to races against vmscan inode reclaim, unmount, etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/