Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 02:16:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 02:16:07 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:60939 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 02:15:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:15:53 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andi Kleen , Marcelo Tosatti , "Dave S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tcp_do_sendmsg() allocation still broken ? Message-ID: <20001029081553.A18159@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20001029020311.A16003@gruyere.muc.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 11:46:37PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 11:46:37PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > Think about swap-over-network. swap-over-network is unlikely to ever work properly without a preallocated skb pool, no matter if you use sk->allocation or not. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/