Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758173Ab0LCOGP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:06:15 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:38095 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692Ab0LCOGN (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:06:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:36:07 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kiviti , Ingo Molnar , Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Message-ID: <20101203140607.GA9800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20101202144129.4357fe00@annuminas.surriel.com> <20101202144423.3ad1908d@annuminas.surriel.com> <1291382619.32004.2124.camel@laptop> <20101203133056.GF27994@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1291385010.32004.2165.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291385010.32004.2165.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 602 Lines: 14 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > No, because they do receive service (they spend some time spinning > before being interrupted), so the respective vruntimes will increase, at > some point they'll pass B0 and it'll get scheduled. Is that sufficient to ensure that B0 receives its fair share (1/3 cpu in this case)? - vatsa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/