Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754020Ab0LCV0L (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:26:11 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:43472 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752524Ab0LCV0J convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Rik van Riel , vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kiviti , Ingo Molnar , Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <1291388987.7992.27.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <20101202144129.4357fe00@annuminas.surriel.com> <20101202144423.3ad1908d@annuminas.surriel.com> <1291355656.7633.124.camel@marge.simson.net> <20101203134618.GG27994@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1291387511.7992.15.camel@marge.simson.net> <4CF90341.4020101@redhat.com> <1291388987.7992.27.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1291411578.2032.9.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 26 On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:09 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:48 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On 12/03/2010 09:45 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > I'll have to go back and re-read that. Off the top of my head, I see no > > > way it could matter which container the numbers live in as long as they > > > keep advancing, and stay in the same runqueue. (hm, task weights would > > > have to be the same too or scaled. dangerous business, tinkering with > > > vruntimes) > > > > They're not necessarily in the same runqueue, the > > VCPU that is given time might be on another CPU > > than the one that was spinning on a lock. > > I don't think pumping vruntime cross cfs_rq would be safe, for the > reason noted (et al). No competition means vruntime is meaningless. > Donating just advances a clock that nobody's looking at. Yeah, cross-cpu you have to model it like exchanging lag. That's a slightly more complicated trick (esp. since we still don't have a proper measure for lag) but it should be doable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/