Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755227Ab0LDR2E (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:28:04 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:44565 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752396Ab0LDR2C (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:28:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:27:18 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, jason.wessel@windriver.com, Andi Kleen , lwn@lwn.net Subject: Re: Announcement: Plans for v2.6.34-longterm Message-ID: <20101204172718.GB10282@kroah.com> References: <20101203210719.GB21223@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101203210719.GB21223@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1752 Lines: 37 On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:07:19PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Firstly, I'd like to thank Greg for all the past work he's done on > juggling all these different stable releases - many people have > reaped the benefits of them for quite some time, and it only makes > sense to spread the loading around as it has grown significantly. > > With that in mind, it is our intention to also maintain a 2.6.34 > longterm tree. Jason and I work at Wind River, which already has > released products based on v2.6.34, and as such it only makes sense > to have a public long-term tree that others who are also based on > 2.6.34 can make use of. > > I've already done an end-to-end audit of the current 2.6.32 longterm > stable release, and used the list of these already "approved for stable" > patches on v2.6.32 to identify 260 upstream commits that are applicable, > but not yet present in the last 2.6.34.7 stable release. > > A candidate tree for 2.6.34.8 with the above 260 commits applied to > it is available now for review/testing at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/linux-2.6.34.y.git That's great, but you really don't want to keep the patches in a "combined" git tree like this for development and review. What happens if someone says "patch 121 needs to be removed"? I recommend using quilt like we have been for the stable tree for the past 5+ years as it handles situations like this very well. Other than that, good luck with this, it's a lot of work :) greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/