Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755481Ab0LDXz7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:55:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:55966 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755247Ab0LDXz6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:55:58 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Wla8bkHn+8wDv8kPGKX0HUt0MU/FGLL3/W1Z10zi8LRWof+z2UTCmJBjK7DFDHhGen pRwfj+L27F52KuFdjPLu4dLBqBT1ZQCSPhbAMP7nfWblNYRGUBx/X/CMp3mKi4H2XRKk f6KHFq0SRmn5xB0D87Ydvly+szbp/BGe/zp0E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CF87C14.8000708@google.com> References: <20101121133744.GA10765@elte.hu> <1290700829.4759.16.camel@maggy.simson.net> <1290954299.30515.15.camel@marge.simson.net> <4CF5C379.8030204@google.com> <1291184173.7466.147.camel@marge.simson.net> <4CF87C14.8000708@google.com> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 23:55:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups From: James Courtier-Dutton To: Paul Turner Cc: Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1133 Lines: 28 On 3 December 2010 05:11, Paul Turner wrote: > > I actually don't have a desktop setup handy to test "interactivity" (sad but > true -- working on grabbing one).  But it looks better on under synthetic > load. > What tools are actually used to test "interactivity" ? I posted a tool to the list some time ago, but I don't think anyone noticed. My tool is very simple. When you hold a key down, it should repeat. It should repeat at a constant predictable interval. So, my tool just waits for key presses and times when each one occurred. The tester simply presses a key and holds it down. If the time between each key press is constant, it indicates good "interactivity". If the time between each key press varies a lot, it indicates bad "interactivity". You can reliably test if one kernel is better than the next using actual measurable figures. Kind Regards James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/