Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751368Ab0LFGBi (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:01:38 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:37727 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032Ab0LFGBh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:01:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FBM81kfKuFaUGr7sVpanfOezLkP/PgVmbLGX0oCOW8S1QLrHi39+m3qElSivY4+IEk AXJs7nHAOAef27F01rYI5rsk3pPhn+AgVxVTLPTudlLbZwhmtaJKLP8pg0bKwAUCnL/L ws/YmnBV9OuBELalr6JbmFXVpKLtkBvQNymVU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20101203210719.GB21223@windriver.com> <20101204172840.GC10282@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:01:36 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcement: Plans for v2.6.34-longterm From: Minchan Kim To: Greg KH Cc: Paul Gortmaker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, jason.wessel@windriver.com, Andi Kleen , lwn@lwn.net, Tim Bird Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1454 Lines: 44 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:07:19PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> With that in mind, it is our intention to also maintain a 2.6.34 >>> longterm tree. ?Jason and I work at Wind River, which already has >>> released products based on v2.6.34, and as such it only makes sense >>> to have a public long-term tree that others who are also based on >>> 2.6.34 can make use of. >> >> Other than Wind River, what other distros/userbases are using .34 as a >> platform for their products? > > I am not sure companies/platforms(Sony, Google, Meego, and Linaro) > mentioned below article really made a promise to produce product. > Article said, they decided 2.6.35 with flag version. > If it were real, I think flag version impact would be big on embedded > system(To be honest, alone android is enough big) > Cced Tim. > > http://lwn.net/Articles/413341/ > > Thanks for you effort, Good Luck, Paul. :) Oops, I realized Andi maintains 2.6.35-longterm. It's good to hear. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/