Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:16:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:16:12 -0400 Received: from cambot.suite224.net ([209.176.64.2]:6149 "EHLO suite224.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: <001e01c21349$f5f66060$f7f583d0@pcs686> From: "Matthew D. Pitts" To: In-Reply-To: <200206140013.g5E0DQR25561@localhost.localdomain> <20020614024547.H16772@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH: NEW SUBARCHITECTURE FOR 2.5.21] support for NCR voyager (3/4/5xxx series) Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:19:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Sounds quite logical. What does the current patches you have do ? I've > > > not had chance to look at them yet. > > It creates directories `generic' for the standard pc and `visws'. The voyager > > patch creates a `voyager' directory. Alternatively, these could be `mach-pc', > > `mach-visws' and `mach-voyager'. > > Yeah, I think mach-foo would be more aesthetically pleasing, so I'll > cast my vote for that one. If nothing else, it makes it obvious that > the subdir isn't important if you don't care about $subarch > I think it would be a good idea as well. Matthew - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/