Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:42:13 +0100
From: Michel Arboi <michel@arboi.fr.eu.org>
To: Giel van Schijndel <me@mortis.eu>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch for Fintek F71869 watchdoh
Message-ID: <20101206234213.4e3c6ae6@marmite>
In-Reply-To: <20101206202155.GB3188@salidar.me.mortis.eu>
References: <4CFCB76D.2060405@redhat.com>
	<20101206191930.GA3188@salidar.me.mortis.eu>
	<20101206205345.639f31bb@marmite>
	<20101206202155.GB3188@salidar.me.mortis.eu>
Organization: Compilo ergo sum
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 955
Lines: 22

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:21:55 +0100
Giel van Schijndel <me@mortis.eu> wrote:

> That's intended behaviour and probably sufficient for testing.  Most
> of the behaviour isn't chip-specific, only the initialisation and
> configuration of the chip is specific to that chip AFAIK.

OK. Hans, if you need some tests for the sensors part, you can send me a
patch and I'll try to help.
[I suspect that the current Linux code works, sensors reports 62 ?C /
59 ?C for the CPU]

> PS You might want to include patches inline (i.e. as part of the
> message text) as that's standard procedure for Linux MLs.  That
> allows easy reviewing and commenting on patches.

OK. In fact I did not know how to submit a kernel patch. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/