Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:19:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:19:16 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:27876 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:19:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020613.211425.60193542.davem@redhat.com> To: oliver@neukum.name Cc: roland@topspin.com, wjhun@ayrnetworks.com, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200206111623.30842.oliver@neukum.name> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Oliver Neukum Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:23:30 +0200 Still does that justify the overhead and the complications ? Couldn't we provide for the worst case in a generic kernel and make it a compile time option ? I already posted that using the worst case scenerio would be an acceptable solution to this problem, I consider it a closed issue and you can ignore my earlier gripes on this issue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/