Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752332Ab0LGGnE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:43:04 -0500 Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:42219 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138Ab0LGGnC (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:43:02 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Allow strong and weak functions in LIB_OBJS From: Ian Munsie To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo In-reply-to: <1290991642-sup-5890@au1.ibm.com> References: <1290658375-10342-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au1.ibm.com> <1290658375-10342-2-git-send-email-imunsie@au1.ibm.com> <20101126211836.GA5864@ghostprotocols.net> <1290991642-sup-5890@au1.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:42:58 +1100 Message-Id: <1291704103-sup-9818@au1.ibm.com> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 792 Lines: 20 Excerpts from Ian Munsie's message of Mon Nov 29 11:53:07 +1100 2010: > I'm not seeing any of those warnings or errors on either of the systems > I have been testing on (x86_64 + PPC64), but it looks like the linker is > trying to pull in too much from the system libraries. > > Can you test the below patch to see if the messages go away - it only > applies the whole-archive flag to libperf.a, whereas before I was also > applying it to pthread, libelf, etc. Hey Arnaldo, Just wondering if you got around to testing this patch? Thanks, -Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/