Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755223Ab0LGVDB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:03:01 -0500 Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:38839 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754962Ab0LGVDA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:03:00 -0500 Subject: Re: bugs/regressions: report in LKML or in bugzilla? From: Ben Hutchings To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Martin Steigerwald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev In-Reply-To: <1291738321.2695.338.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <201012071639.58884.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <1291738321.2695.338.camel@edumazet-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Solarflare Communications Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:02:56 +0000 Message-ID: <1291755776.21627.13.camel@bwh-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.0 (2.32.0-2.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2010 21:02:59.0290 (UTC) FILETIME=[20DB03A0:01CB9652] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-6.500.1024-17814.005 X-TM-AS-Result: No--27.356100-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1507 Lines: 42 On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:12 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mardi 07 décembre 2010 à 16:39 +0100, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : > > > A participant of a linux performance training I hold found a bug with > > window scaling which did not receive any reply as well: > > > > Bug 20312 - System freeze with multiples of 32 in > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20312 > > > > User bug ? > > Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt > > tcp_adv_win_scale - INTEGER > Count buffering overhead as bytes/2^tcp_adv_win_scale > (if tcp_adv_win_scale > 0) or bytes-bytes/2^(-tcp_adv_win_scale), > if it is <= 0. > Default: 2 > > Given we use 32bit numbers, using values outside of [-31 ... 31] makes litle sense. > > We could add sysctl range limit, but user should not mess with > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/parameters unless he knows what he is doing ? [...] For mere humans, the range is not quite os obvious. Which is why this has been fixed in net-2.6 (as noted on that bug report now). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/