Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:40:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:40:16 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:3847 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:40:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:34:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: "Jason C. Pion" cc: Nick Evgeniev , Andre Hedrick , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux 2.4.19-preX IDE bugs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jason C. Pion wrote: > It sounds to me like you've got some flakey hardware. Don't try to save > the rest of us. I've been using the Promise drivers with my Ultra 133TX2 > for quite a while now and haven't had _ANY_ problems with it. I've used > all of the 2.4.19preXX kernels so far with now issues. This "problem" > isn't as wide-spread as you think. Clearly *any* problem which only happens with SMP isn't as wide-spread, and if you are running uni then there should not be a problem. Given that earlier and later similar chipset have a sticky bit and no problem, I think it would be reasonable to protect people in a stable kernel. If the config file needed to be patched and there were a warning on the next line, that would certainly assure they knew they were taking a risk. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/