Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:47:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:47:48 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:7439 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:47:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3D0A1E31.3030600@evision-ventures.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:47:45 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020611 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Jens Axboe , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org U?ytkownik Linus Torvalds napisa?: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>- current 2.5 bk deadlocks reading partition info off disk. Again a >> locking problem I suppose, to be honest I just got very tired when >> seeing it happen and didn't want to spend tim looking into it. > > > Hmm. There's a bug in "balance_irq()" if you are trying to run a SMP > kernel on an UP machine right now, and it _might_ be that the lockup has > nothing to do with the IDE layer, but simple with the first PCI interrupt > (as opposed to local timer interrupt) coming in. ... > I don't know. Might be the IDE code too, of course. Just to complete the picture: I'm running SMP kernels on UP for the sake of spinlock debugging and compilatoin coverage too. But as I have already stated - I run my own patches on top of the last offical release instead of BK contents. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/