Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:12:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:12:22 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:55237 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:12:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:12:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Linus Torvalds cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Peter Osterlund , Patrick Mochel , Tobias Diedrich , Alessandro Suardi , Subject: Re: 2.5.20 - Xircom PCI Cardbus doesn't work In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I suspect that forcing resource assignment into "pci_enable_device()" > should fix that too. > > Although there should probably be some way for the driver to tell which > resources it cares about (some drivers care about the PCI ROM's, for > example, others don't. Some drivers don't care about the IO region, and > others don't care about the MEM region). So the _right_ answer might be to > pass in a bitmap to "pci_enable_device()", which tells the enable code > which parts the driver really cares about.. That reminds me of some idea I had been thinking about for some time: What about adding some pci_request_irq() and pci_request_{,mem_}_region, which would allow for some cleanup of ever-recurring code sequences in drivers, and which at the same time would allow for the above? pci_request_mem_region() might even include the ioremap() as well ;) And yeah, eventually, that might be better done at 'struct device' level, but that doesn't make a difference to the conceptual idea. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/