Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754705Ab0LHKvh (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:51:37 -0500 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:37679 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754348Ab0LHKvg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 05:51:36 -0500 From: Jeremy Kerr To: "Uwe =?iso-8859-1?q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v8 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:51:22 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-23-generic; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1291774094.269634.503532219345.0.gpush@pororo> <20101208103355.GK18244@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20101208103355.GK18244@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012081851.23218.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 806 Lines: 23 Hi Uwe, > I would have expected that clk-common is an ancestor of clk-common-mx51. > Currently it bases on v7(?) that doesn't have the spinlock. > > BTW, I took a quick look over the patches in clk-common-mx51 and I think > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/clock.h doesn't compile without > CONFIG_USE_COMMON_STRUCT_CLK (because then there is no struct clk_mxc), > so either you need more magic or just remove the #ifndef > CONFIG_USE_COMMON_STRUCT_CLK. Ah, I haven't pushed updates to the clk-common-mx51 branch yet, I'll get to this soon. Cheers, Jeremy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/