From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:53:45 +1030
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-23-generic; KDE/4.5.1; i686; ; )
Cc: kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@osdl.org
References: <201011271401.22773.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <1291379941-31565-1-git-send-email-kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> <20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101208.090954.115924303.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201012090753.46050.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1081
Lines: 25

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:39:54 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> Date: Fri,  3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100
> 
> > The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins. 
> > However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called 
> > lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash
> > functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html.
> > 
> > Please consider applying the following patches.
> 
> Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are
> no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am
> happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well.
> 
> Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you?

Yes, 2/2 good.  Thanks Jozsef!

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/