Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:41:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:41:29 -0400 Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.62]:5099 "EHLO snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:41:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:42:39 -0400 To: akpm@zip.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020615104239.GA30698@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> > test the crap out of a kernel :). >> Linux Test Project's runalltests.sh has occasionally triggered a bug. > Is this still happening? What was the bug? That's just a general suggestion with regard to kernel testing. Recent 2.5.x hasn't had a problem completing LTP runalltests.sh. I've used LTP to narrow down a couple early 2.4.x reiserfs bugs to a specific test case. LTP has occasionally triggered oops and livelocks too. It's a useful regression test. >> 2.5 took a drop in dbench throughput recently. >> >> dbench ext2 128 processes Average High Low(MB/sec) > Is this still with 384 megs of memory? Yes. > 2.5.19 18.60 21.69 14.58 > 2.5.20 12.89 13.15 12.79 > One possibile culprit here is the doubling of the request queue size > in 2.5.20. A long time ago it was 1024 slots. Then it went to > 128. That's where it is in Marcelo kernels. Then -ac kernels > went up to 1024 because they have read-latency2. Somehow 2.5 found > itself at 256 slots. In 2.5.20 it slealthily snuck up to 512 > slots. I didn't squeak about this because I was interested to see what > effect it would have. Interesting. I've seen read-latency2 drop dbench throughput in -aa kernels (but I use it anyway). I'd like to capture the request queue size. Is there a command or file in /proc that displays it, or should I just grep drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c? > Does this patch get the throughput back? I will try that next. -- Randy Hron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/