Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:39:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:39:52 -0400 Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.49]:21499 "EHLO scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:39:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:41:06 -0400 To: davej@suse.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020615114106.GA30772@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated > not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to > work on other areas could have something solid to build upon. > I regret not following through on that instinct. I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas 2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj. -- Randy Hron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/