Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:50:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:50:12 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:45324 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:50:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 13:50:12 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: rwhron@earthlink.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020615135012.B16772@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020615114106.GA30772@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: > > When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated > > not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to > > work on other areas could have something solid to build upon. > > I regret not following through on that instinct. > > I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have > been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas > 2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series > is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj. That's interesting. What exactly was failing ? It'd be in everyones interests to get those bits pushed to Linus sooner. Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/