Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932096Ab0LIWxn (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:53:43 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43416 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756337Ab0LIWxj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4D015DEF.9000302@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:53:35 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett CC: x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] X86: Revamp reboot behaviour to match Windows more closely References: <1291931204-5854-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <4D015741.7090500@zytor.com> <20101209223201.GA23894@srcf.ucam.org> <4D015914.1040009@zytor.com> <20101209223847.GA24452@srcf.ucam.org> <4D015ACF.1050105@zytor.com> <20101209225142.GA25215@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20101209225142.GA25215@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1492 Lines: 35 On 12/09/2010 02:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:40:15PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 12/09/2010 02:38 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >>>> Windows doesn't get validated on old hardware. >>> >>> XP does this, and older hardware predates the version of the ACPI spec >>> that introduced this flag. >>> >> >> ACPI is very buggy on early implementations, presumably because WHQL had >> not yet been extended to include it. That is exactly why we combine >> these kinds of things with a date check. > > I'm afraid I don't understand your argument. The date cutoff would be on > the order of 2001 (anything after this will have been tested with XP). > The spec that defines this behaviour only came into existence in August > 2000, and any older hardware will be missing the flag that indicates > that this feature is supported. It doesn't seem realistic to believe > that there's any real body of hardware that sets the flag but otherwise > has a broken implementation. > 2001 is probably a good date, then. It's pretty safe you'll see the bit being set on systems which are older than that, even if it was not defined at the time it was created -- just being garbage. That's par for the course in BIOS land. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/