Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757618Ab0LJA6s (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:58:48 -0500 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:64321 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754325Ab0LJA6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:58:47 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6192"; a="66018434" Message-ID: <4D017B45.4000805@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:58:45 -0800 From: Saravana Kannan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: dwalker@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Ohlstein , Catalin Marinas , Tejun Heo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: move consistent_init to early_initcall References: <1291327879-28073-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> <20101202221909.GK29347@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4CF94DDD.8000409@codeaurora.org> <20101203203653.GB10245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4CFDD297.4020600@codeaurora.org> <15d23d63900e4545a40555961c49c421.squirrel@codeaurora.org> <20101209103835.GA31465@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101209103835.GA31465@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1073 Lines: 25 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:23:24AM -0800, skannan@codeaurora.org wrote: >> Russell, Have you had a chance to look at this? Any comments? How do we >> move ahead? > > I had connected the other thread with this one - it's pretty hard not > to as it included this patch in that set as the first patch. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Ok. So what's your take on handling the cache coherency with secure domain? Do we get to add cache invalidate APIs outside of DMA APIs? -Saravana -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/