Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757760Ab0LJBf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:35:26 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:20960 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757558Ab0LJBfZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:35:25 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,322,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="685701612" From: "Zheng, Shaohui" To: David Rientjes , Tejun Heo CC: Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "haicheng.li@linux.intel.com" , "lethal@linux-sh.org" , Andi Kleen , "dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "Brown, Len" , Yinghai Lu , "Li, Haicheng" , Shaohui Zheng Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:35:08 +0800 Subject: RE: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 Thread-Topic: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 Thread-Index: AcuXIALuGAJJUAcJT5GzbHvnQcqu1QATaMrQ Message-ID: References: <20101207010033.280301752@intel.com> <20101207010140.092555703@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1592 Lines: 36 Both Tejun's and my patches are under review process, the hotplug emulator patchset is much earlier than Tejun's patch. Currently, I did not know how to handle this situation. It seems that I have 3 options: 1) continue to send this patchset based on current upstream kernel 2) continue to send this patchset based on upstream kernel + Tejun's patch 3) Postpone the patchset until Tejun's patches are accepted. Can someone provide some suggestions? Thanks so much. Thanks & Regards, Shaohui -----Original Message----- From: David Rientjes [mailto:rientjes@google.com] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:37 AM To: Zheng, Shaohui; Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; haicheng.li@linux.intel.com; lethal@linux-sh.org; Andi Kleen; dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Ingo Molnar; Brown, Len; Yinghai Lu; Li, Haicheng Subject: Re: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, shaohui.zheng@intel.com wrote: > From: Shaohui Zheng > This patch is undoubtedly going to conflict with Tejun's unification of the 32 and 64 bit NUMA boot paths, specifically the patch at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087151912379. Tejun, what's the status of that patchset posted on November 27? Any comments about this change? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/