Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753044Ab0LJKAS (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:00:18 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:56597 "EHLO mail-iw0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825Ab0LJKAN (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:00:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=HlwJeWgOSvQX2jeIsMP4mF7ew7lbZaF1XtsZe2R9domQltoGXTZNR+trezcsiY47bo 66YxYKWEon5WhY3dwNarLA2gSR60WhX+dH2KjVBBMuN4KX/XAucOGlUGzY9/ynGURIIW D2SolMuNAUmw+El/o9Gj4QumBWcYXlo8MbufM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D017B45.4000805@codeaurora.org> References: <1291327879-28073-1-git-send-email-johlstei@codeaurora.org> <20101202221909.GK29347@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4CF94DDD.8000409@codeaurora.org> <20101203203653.GB10245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4CFDD297.4020600@codeaurora.org> <15d23d63900e4545a40555961c49c421.squirrel@codeaurora.org> <20101209103835.GA31465@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D017B45.4000805@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:00:12 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6ofuGFxKENVULZkhPGuTAnfIlBM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dma-mapping: move consistent_init to early_initcall From: Catalin Marinas To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , dwalker@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Ohlstein , Tejun Heo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 23 On 10 December 2010 00:58, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 01:23:24AM -0800, skannan@codeaurora.org wrote: >>> >>> Russell, Have you had a chance to look at this? Any comments? How do we >>> move ahead? >> >> I had connected the other thread with this one - it's pretty hard not >> to as it included this patch in that set as the first patch. > > Ok. So what's your take on handling the cache coherency with secure domain? > Do we get to add cache invalidate APIs outside of DMA APIs? Can the secure software not create NS pages and be fully coherent? -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/