Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:01:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:01:37 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:21419 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:01:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:00:47 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: rwhron@earthlink.net Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020615210047.GL22961@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , rwhron@earthlink.net, akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020615210009.GA32730@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At some point in the past, akpm wrote: >> Does this patch get the throughput back? On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:00:09PM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: > That makes all the difference to dbench. Throughput > for dbench 128 up over 40% compared to vanilla 2.5.21. How does it do against the prior 2.5 kernels? Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/