Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756824Ab0LMJRH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:17:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26151 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756789Ab0LMJRF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:17:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4D05E483.1000106@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:51 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: mst@redhat.com, gregkh@suse.de, ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after slot swap References: <201012131244.547034648@firstfloor.org> <20101212234644.B05DAB27BF@basil.firstfloor.org> <4D05DC98.40105@redhat.com> <044a861a2279c7e3e328c73e6694fbf3.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> <4D05E096.6060307@redhat.com> <74ff92a8c4cf72e42e7559de72e77b52.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> <4D05E2A5.8070204@redhat.com> <20101213091254.GA999@basil.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20101213091254.GA999@basil.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1173 Lines: 31 On 12/13/2010 11:12 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > - Greg rejects kvm patches (but not virtio etc) pointing submitters > > to the kvm maintainers > > - The kvm maintainers collect stable kvm patches and autotest them > > As I understand this patch came in this way for .36 > (I took it from .36-stable) The patch was autotested for .36-stable, it wasn't autotested for .35-stable. It will very likely work (this isn't code that changes a lot), but still. > > - They then submit the patches to stable@ > > Do you want to do the autotest explicitely for .35 too and no automatic > backports and do the same procedure as for newer kernels? > > I can do that, but you would need to do it for a long time. Yes. In fact it gets more important as time goes by, since as time goes by patches are more likely to cause regressions due to changes in the code base. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/