Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757674Ab0LMNQG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:16:06 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.161.180]:60277 "EHLO mail-gx0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757653Ab0LMNQD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:16:03 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-url:user-agent; b=RLVSZARmuH4Bfx7doY4qrM983KPNsWCiAzWrLcX+jZ21m03kau/6LsJJgGj9SNAzM5 1fuDI0bvcXdmiAwXYop0iU44zURyPeadHD83rV5q4KyGJl6HmpoNiUF2scJ18V2PuzyP JGpd2VHDpaE2BYYfyN5yHbpiFU9UDbcVsJ2t0= Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:15:57 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: David Ahern , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Add reference timestamp to perf header Message-ID: <20101213131557.GD5407@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1291773285-16254-1-git-send-email-daahern@cisco.com> <1291773285-16254-2-git-send-email-daahern@cisco.com> <20101212201613.GA1784@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101212201613.GA1784@nowhere> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1210 Lines: 28 Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:16:16PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:54:44PM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > @@ -191,6 +191,40 @@ static int write_padded(int fd, const void *bf, size_t count, > > +static int perf_header__read_ref_time(struct perf_header *header, > > + int fd, u64 offset, u64 size) > > +{ > > + size_t sz_nsec = sizeof(header->nsec_ref); > > + size_t sz_tv = sizeof(header->tv_ref); > > + int err = -1; > > + > > + if (((size - offset) < (sz_nsec + sz_tv)) || > > + (read(fd, &header->nsec_ref, sz_nsec) != (ssize_t) sz_nsec) || > > + (read(fd, &header->tv_ref, sz_tv) != (ssize_t) sz_tv)) > > + goto out; > > Hmm, could we have endianness related troubles if we write the timespec on > an arch and cross read from another, or other cross read issues? Well spotted, it needs to use perf_header__getbuffer64 and make sure that nsec_ref, etc are u64 fields. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/