Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S131951AbQLLPtx>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:49:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131986AbQLLPtn>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:49:43 -0500
Received: from 513.holly-springs.nc.us ([216.27.31.173]:2334 "EHLO
	513.holly-springs.nc.us") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S131951AbQLLPt0>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:49:26 -0500
Message-ID: <3A3641DB.C54E8A8C@holly-springs.nc.us>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:18:51 -0500
From: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18pre21 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: josef h??k <josef.hook@arrowhead.se>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012081626140.7741-100000@www.nondot.org> <3A31B8CC.7030604@kalifornia.com> <3A355840.CFDF8810@holly-springs.nc.us> <3A363EAF.314AB45@arrowhead.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

josef h??k wrote:
> 
> What about implementing 9P  instead

That would rock. Plan9 is unix done the right way -- i.e., the fully
consistent way. I'd love to see 9p in Linux. We're heading that
direction anyway, with procfs, devfs, etc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/