Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759628Ab0LNQye (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:54:34 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:54445 "EHLO mail-bw0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758694Ab0LNQyd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:54:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=bpRaRSP4ToXAz0MP5QpzsjbweLjMfn1fWguhx6WQT4RCcBATyJfdq43j46KcVNUNmv gvVj5f4w4C68rMR7GR2h/NG902Sjh47BiUVobt6U3RI66B0BQwAOODOxpeOOlQv1PBP3 L60YvD8WkmKWeZ4kxYjdujgxhRGkW8pFH7S0A= Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/30] mtd: don't use flush_scheduled_work() From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <1292086307-19211-28-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1292086307-19211-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1292086307-19211-28-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:53:53 +0200 Message-ID: <1292345633.2538.101.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1272 Lines: 32 On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 17:51 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > flush_scheduled_work() is deprecated and scheduled to be removed. > Directly flush cxt->work_{erase|write} on removal instead. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: David Woodhouse > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > --- > This is part of a series to remove flush_scheduled_work() usage to > prepare for deprecation of flush_scheduled_work(). Patches in this > series are self contained and mostly straight-forward. > > Please feel free to take it into the appropriate tree, or just ack it. > In the latter case, I'll merge the patch through the workqueue tree > during the next merge window. > > If you're seeing this patch for the second time, it's because the > commit hasn't showed up in mainline yet. Please let me know what > should be done. Pushed to l2-mtd-2.6.git, thanks. This means this will be merged to the mtd tree a bit later and will go upstream. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/