Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757869Ab0LOC1j (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:27:39 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:36337 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757753Ab0LOC1h (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:27:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:27:35 -0600 From: Jack Steiner To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: lenb@kernel.org, hmh@hmh.eng.br, tony.luck@gmail.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gbeshers@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED Message-ID: <20101215022735.GA19601@sgi.com> References: <20101214220932.GA1206@sgi.com> <4D07F6A2.2030706@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D07F6A2.2030706@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 649 Lines: 16 On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:58:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/14/2010 02:09 PM, Jack Steiner wrote: > > Map ACPI tables as WB on x86_64. No substantive changes to IA64. > > Why just x86-64? We never observed a performance problem on IA64. Not sure if it maps ACPI space as WB or not. Since I did not have easy access to an ia64, I chose not to make any changes to the way it maps the table. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/