Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758516Ab0LOCmx (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:42:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:64694 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752Ab0LOCmv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:42:51 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EyW7wGoT8hFKTLNaW4765zvlhges+j1TdZRNlqRGZic3TwZrPMSqMBDrDj6gjW9y5E L0wdPKszIuAIpiRitihWBQshetaelVi24lorC1lMlAMY34MlYP1CdzkcF2mRAieYKzl3 tXwzpccTtepxFogFJWWCU40zSywLuX0wcKmtw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101214214306.GC5900@hanuman.home.ifup.org> References: <20101212131550.GA2608@darkstar> <20101214003024.GA3575@hanuman.home.ifup.org> <20101214214306.GC5900@hanuman.home.ifup.org> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:42:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] bttv: fix mutex use before init From: Dave Young To: Brandon Philips Cc: Torsten Kaiser , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , Chris Clayton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1363 Lines: 43 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Brandon Philips wrote: > On 21:56 Tue 14 Dec 2010, Torsten Kaiser wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Brandon Philips wrote: >> > On 17:13 Sun 12 Dec 2010, Torsten Kaiser wrote: >> >>  * change &fh->cap.vb_lock in bttv_open() AND radio_open() to >> >> &btv->init.cap.vb_lock >> >>  * add a mutex_init(&btv->init.cap.vb_lock) to the setup of init in bttv_probe() >> > >> > That seems like a reasonable suggestion. An openSUSE user submitted this >> > bug to our tracker too. Here is the patch I am having him test. >> > >> > Would you mind testing it? >> >> No. :-) >> >> Without this patch (==vanilla 2.6.37-rc5) I got 2 more OOPSe by >> restarting hal around 20 times. >> After applying this patch, I did not see a single OOPS after 100 restarts. >> So it looks like the fix is correct. > > Dave, Torsten- Great thanks for testing, can I get both you and Dave's > Tested-by then? Feel free to add my tested-by line for this, Thanks > > Mauro- can you please pick up this patch? > > Cheers, > >        Brandon > -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/