Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316342AbSGATwg>; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:52:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316364AbSGATwf>; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:52:35 -0400
Received: from [213.4.129.129] ([213.4.129.129]:59226 "EHLO tsmtp7.mail.isp")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S316342AbSGATwe>;
	Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:52:34 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 21:57:18 +0200
From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@teleline.es>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OKS] Module removal
Message-Id: <20020701215718.7762962f.diegocg@teleline.es>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020701133907.23769A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020701133907.23769A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 827
Lines: 18

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> escribi?:

> Having read some notes on the Ottawa Kernel Summit, I'd like to offer
> some comments on points raied.
> 
> The suggestion was made that kernel module removal be depreciated or
> removed. I'd like to note that there are two common uses for this
> capability, and the problems addressed by module removal should be
> kept in mind. These are in addition to the PCMCIA issue raised.

And why people wants to remove this nice feature? Only because they
don't use it, or there's a more profund reason?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/