Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757350Ab0LPWD3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:03:29 -0500 Received: from oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.60]:46815 "HELO oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753948Ab0LPWD0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:03:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=ZzYG/RgR7dAG+8T9XcrAQ9gN8vnuK8okIv96edhtKMqpX7LmyxTvj7+xas/xZq7OQL+j65JEbk/McOUfqT8+RWIf2i5fOB6igAeAHY2J+l0f5Xn1uqm+zU+uEQJknjig; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:03:21 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Len Brown , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Adam Belay Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI: revert to allocating bottom-up, avoid E820 areas Message-ID: <20101216140321.1a75ccef@jbarnes-desktop> In-Reply-To: References: <20101216173614.8185.19462.stgit@bob.kio> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.174.193.198 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 31 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:59:33 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > So I think the best band-aid for now is to revert to bottom-up allocation > > and do a better job of avoiding E820 reserved areas.  Obviously, it's not > > complete because we could still trip over ACPI devices (as in 23802), but > > that's a problem we've always had and it's not as likely if we go bottom-up. > > Ok, ack for this series. Have we got testers for it? In particular, > have the people who have seen regressions been notified of this new > series? > > That said, let's just try to merge it quickly so that we get maximal > coverage before the holiday season starts. Jesse, it makes sense > through your tree, but if you'd rather me take it directly, I can do > that. I'll pull it into my tree and send you a pull req tomorrow if that's ok. I have a couple of fixes besides this, but I have to drop Bjorn's earlier series... Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/