Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:40:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:40:52 -0400 Received: from realimage.realnet.co.sz ([196.28.7.3]:57497 "HELO netfinity.realnet.co.sz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:40:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:12:03 +0200 (SAST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@netfinity.realnet.co.sz To: Helge Hafting Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: lilo/raid? In-Reply-To: <3D216157.FC60B17E@aitel.hist.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1042 Lines: 32 On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > /dev/md1 swap swap defaults 0 0 > > > > One small thing, you do know that you can interleave swap? > > There are sometimes reasons not to do that. > Heavy swapping may be caused by attempts to cache > massive io on some fs. You better not have swap > on that heavily accessed spindle - because then > everything ends up waiting on that io. > > Keeping swap somewhere else means other programs > just wait a little for swap - undisturbed by the massive > io also going on. True, but what i meant was that instead of creating a RAID device to swap to, he could have just interleaved normal swap partitions and gotten the same effect. Regards, Zwane Mwaikambo -- http://function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/