Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:16:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:16:22 -0400 Received: from cibs9.sns.it ([192.167.206.29]:22534 "EHLO cibs9.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:16:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:05:04 +0200 (CEST) From: venom@sns.it To: "J.A. Magallon" cc: Tom Rini , Bill Davidsen , Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4 In-Reply-To: <20020701234432.GC1697@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1268 Lines: 38 On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote: > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 01:44:32 +0200 > From: J.A. Magallon > To: Tom Rini > Cc: Bill Davidsen , > Linux-Kernel Mailing List > Subject: Re: [OKS] O(1) scheduler in 2.4 > > > On 2002.07.01 Tom Rini wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:52:54PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > >> What's the issue? > > > >a) We're at 2.4.19-rc1 right now. It would be horribly > >counterproductive to put O(1) in right now. > > .20-pre1 would be a good start, but my hope is that this reserved for > the vm updates from -aa ;). If I am not wrong in the AA tree the O(1) scheduler has been merged, so there is an opportunity do update booth ;). > > >c) I also suspect that it hasn't been as widley tested on !x86 as the > >stuff currently in 2.4. And again, 2.4 is the stable tree. > > > Well, I think it has been supposed to high quality test, also if the tester basis was quite reduced... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/