Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:32:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:32:56 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:18704 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:32:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:29:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: "David S. Miller" cc: alex@PolesApart.wox.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 bug in page_alloc.c:131 In-Reply-To: <20020624.080409.79615643.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1010 Lines: 24 On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > This has to do with facts, not opinions. Since we lack the source to > their drivers, we have no idea if some bug in their driver is > scribbling over (ie. corrupting) memory. It is therefore an unknown > which makes it a waste of time for us to pursue the bug report. By that logic if source is freely available the kernel should not be marked tainted, even if the source license is not GPL, as in you can get it and use it to debug, but the license is something like BSD, or the Kermit limited redistribution, etc. I'm asking in general, not about just one particular binary-only driver. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/