Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:36:10 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6.35.10 has been released
Message-ID: <20101219103609.GB28751@basil.fritz.box>
References: <20101214232747.GA18757@basil.fritz.box>
 <877hf66929.fsf@depni.sinp.msu.ru>
 <20101219002146.GA11568@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101219002146.GA11568@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 893
Lines: 23

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 04:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Could you please update this tree:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git ?
> 
> No, the "stable" trees are not being updated anymore, they have moved to
> the longterm git directory instead.

It would be good if the old stable git tree for 2.6.35 was deleted to avoid
confusion. Greg, what do you think?

> That tree is automatically generated by some scripts on kernel.org,
> which might need to be tweaked to handle the movement of the trees now.

I'll request the change from kernel.org

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/