Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:40:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:40:42 -0400 Received: from dingo.clsp.jhu.edu ([128.220.34.67]:30066 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:40:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 02:47:07 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Robert Love Cc: Pradeep Padala , Andrew D Kirch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: ptrace vs /proc Message-ID: <20020702004706.GB107@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1024609747.922.0.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1024609747.922.0.camel@sinai> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 22 Hi! > > As far as I could investigate, I didn't find any such interface in linux. > > Programs like strace do the tracing through ptrace only. > > > > Please let me know if you know more about this. > > There is no such interface in Linux and currently no plans to develop a > Solaris-style /proc. I believe such proc interface is wrong thing to do. ptrace() is really very *very* special thing, and you don't want it hidden in some kind of /proc magic. Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/